Error Measures for Generalizing About Forecasting Methods: Empirical Comparisons

Loading...
Thumbnail Image

Related Collections

Degree type

Discipline

Subject

forecast accuracy
M-Competition
relative absolute error
Theil's U
Marketing

Funder

Grant number

License

Copyright date

Distributor

Related resources

Author

Collopy, Fred

Contributor

Abstract

This study evaluated measures for making comparisons of errors across time series. We analyzed 90 annual and 101 quarterly economic time series. We judged error measures on reliability, construct validity, sensitivity to small changes, protection against outliers, and their relationship to decision making. The results lead us to recommend the Geometric Mean of the Relative Absolute Error (GMRAE) when the task involves calibrating a model for a set of time series. The GMRAE compares the absolute error of a given method to that from the random walk forecast. For selecting the most accurate methods, we recommend the Median RAE (MdRAE)when few series are available and the Median Absolute Percentage Error (MdAPE) otherwise. The Root Mean Square Error (RMSE) is not reliable, and is therefore inappropriate for comparing accuracy across series.

Advisor

Date Range for Data Collection (Start Date)

Date Range for Data Collection (End Date)

Digital Object Identifier

Series name and number

Publication date

1992-06-01

Journal title

Volume number

Issue number

Publisher

Publisher DOI

relationships.isJournalIssueOf

Comments

Postprint version. Published in International Journal of Forecasting, Volume 8, Issue 1, June 1992, pages 69-80. Publisher URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0169-2070(92)90008-W

Recommended citation

Collection