Error Measures for Generalizing About Forecasting Methods: Empirical Comparisons
Related Collections
Degree type
Discipline
Subject
M-Competition
relative absolute error
Theil's U
Marketing
Funder
Grant number
License
Copyright date
Distributor
Related resources
Author
Contributor
Abstract
This study evaluated measures for making comparisons of errors across time series. We analyzed 90 annual and 101 quarterly economic time series. We judged error measures on reliability, construct validity, sensitivity to small changes, protection against outliers, and their relationship to decision making. The results lead us to recommend the Geometric Mean of the Relative Absolute Error (GMRAE) when the task involves calibrating a model for a set of time series. The GMRAE compares the absolute error of a given method to that from the random walk forecast. For selecting the most accurate methods, we recommend the Median RAE (MdRAE)when few series are available and the Median Absolute Percentage Error (MdAPE) otherwise. The Root Mean Square Error (RMSE) is not reliable, and is therefore inappropriate for comparing accuracy across series.
Advisor
Date Range for Data Collection (Start Date)
Date Range for Data Collection (End Date)
Digital Object Identifier
Series name and number
Publication date
Journal title
Volume number
Issue number
Publisher
Publisher DOI
Comments
Postprint version. Published in International Journal of Forecasting, Volume 8, Issue 1, June 1992, pages 69-80. Publisher URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0169-2070(92)90008-W

