Yes/No Questions and Answers in the Map Task Corpus

Loading...
Thumbnail Image

Embargo Date

Degree type

Discipline

Subject

Funder

Grant number

License

Copyright date

Distributor

Related resources

Author

Rossen-Knill, Deborah
Spejewski, Beverly
Hockey, Beth Ann
Stone, Matthew

Contributor

Abstract

We analyze question-answer pairs in a variety of ways, for three different kinds of yes/no questions. We find that the classification of yes/no questions described in (Carletta et al., 1995) for the Edinburgh map task corpus correlates well with whether a response will be a bare yes or no, a yes or no plus additional speech, or just speech without an overt yes or no. Correlation with responses described as “direct” or “indirect” is less good. We also find that the strength of a question’s expectation for a YES response correlates with the move type, the form of the response, and lexical yes choices; and that the move type correlates with the form of the question and with turn-taking schema.

Advisor

Date Range for Data Collection (Start Date)

Date Range for Data Collection (End Date)

Digital Object Identifier

Series name and number

Publication date

1997-07-01

Volume number

Issue number

Publisher

Publisher DOI

Journal Issues

Comments

University of Pennsylvania Institute for Research in Cognitive Science Technical Report No. IRCS-97-11.

Recommended citation

Collection