The Ombudsman: Management Folklore and Management Science: On Portfolio Planning, Escalation Bias and Such

Loading...
Thumbnail Image

Related Collections

Degree type

Discipline

Subject

Funder

Grant number

License

Copyright date

Distributor

Related resources

Contributor

Abstract

Management folklore sometimes leads to unprofitable decision making. Thus, studies of the value of such folklore should be of interest to managers, especially when they identify unprofitable procedures. I reviewed empirical research on scientific publishing and concluded that studies supporting management folklore are likely to be favorably reviewed for publication and to be cited. However, researchers who obtain findings that refute folklore are likely to encounter resistance in publication and are less likely to be cited. My experience with papers on portfolio planning methods and escalation bias illustrates the problem. To encourage the publication of papers that challenge management folklore, editors should use results-blind reviews and, in some cases,constrain, reduce, or eliminate peer review.

Advisor

Date Range for Data Collection (Start Date)

Date Range for Data Collection (End Date)

Digital Object Identifier

Series name and number

Publication date

1996-07-01

Journal title

Volume number

Issue number

Publisher

Publisher DOI

relationships.isJournalIssueOf

Comments

Postprint version. Published in Interfaces, Volume 26, Issue 4, July 1996, pages 28-42. Publisher URL: http://www.aaai.org/AITopics/html/interfaces.html

Recommended citation

Collection