A New Coalescence in the Housing Finance Reform Debate?

Loading...
Thumbnail Image

Embargo Date

Degree type

Discipline

Subject

housing finance reform
Fannie Mae
Freddie Mac
Federal Housing Finance Agency
Housing and Economic Recovery Act
Johnson-Crapo bill
Economic Policy
Public Policy
Real Estate

Funder

Grant number

Copyright date

Distributor

Related resources

Next Steps in the Housing Finance Reform Saga (https://publicpolicy.wharton.upenn.edu/issue-brief/v3n2.php)


A New Coalescence in the Housing Finance Reform Debate? (https://publicpolicy.wharton.upenn.edu/issue-brief/v4n6.php)

Author

McCoy, Patricia A

Contributor

Abstract

In the wake of the stalled Johnson-Crapo bill, the overarching goal of housing finance reform continues to be the efficient provision of long-term fixed-rate mortgages to credit-worthy borrowers in all markets throughout the business cycle.This Issue Brief analyzes three newly-proposed plans for reforming the U.S. housing finance system: (1) a proposal from Jim Parrot et al. to merge Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac into a new government corporation; (2) Andrew Davidson’s proposal for mutual ownership of the GSEs by mortgage originators; and (3) an opposing plan from Mark Calabria, arguing against securitization altogether and for a return to the regime of originate-and-hold.

Advisor

Date Range for Data Collection (Start Date)

Date Range for Data Collection (End Date)

Digital Object Identifier

Series name and number

Publication date

2016-06-01

Volume number

Issue number

Publisher

Publisher DOI

Journal Issues

Comments

Recommended citation

Collection