A New Coalescence in the Housing Finance Reform Debate?
Files
Embargo Date
Related Collections
Degree type
Discipline
Subject
Fannie Mae
Freddie Mac
Federal Housing Finance Agency
Housing and Economic Recovery Act
Johnson-Crapo bill
Economic Policy
Public Policy
Real Estate
Funder
Grant number
Copyright date
Distributor
Related resources
Next Steps in the Housing Finance Reform Saga (https://publicpolicy.wharton.upenn.edu/issue-brief/v3n2.php)
A New Coalescence in the Housing Finance Reform Debate? (https://publicpolicy.wharton.upenn.edu/issue-brief/v4n6.php)
Author
Contributor
Abstract
In the wake of the stalled Johnson-Crapo bill, the overarching goal of housing finance reform continues to be the efficient provision of long-term fixed-rate mortgages to credit-worthy borrowers in all markets throughout the business cycle.This Issue Brief analyzes three newly-proposed plans for reforming the U.S. housing finance system: (1) a proposal from Jim Parrot et al. to merge Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac into a new government corporation; (2) Andrew Davidson’s proposal for mutual ownership of the GSEs by mortgage originators; and (3) an opposing plan from Mark Calabria, arguing against securitization altogether and for a return to the regime of originate-and-hold.

