Better P-curves: Making P-Curve Analysis More Robust to Errors, Fraud, and Ambitious P-Hacking, a Reply to Ulrich and Miller

Loading...
Thumbnail Image

Embargo Date

Related Collections

Degree type

Discipline

Subject

Finance and Financial Management

Funder

Grant number

License

Copyright date

Distributor

Related resources

Contributor

Abstract

When studies examine true effects, they generate right-skewed p-curves, distributions of statistically significant results with more low (.01 s) than high (.04 s) p values. What else can cause a right-skewed p-curve? First, we consider the possibility that researchers report only the smallest significant pvalue (as conjectured by Ulrich & Miller, 2015), concluding that it is a very uncommon problem. We then consider more common problems, including (a) p-curvers selecting the wrong p values, (b) fake data, (c) honest errors, and (d) ambitiously p-hacked (beyond p < .05) results. We evaluate the impact of these common problems on the validity of p-curve analysis, and provide practical solutions that substantially increase its robustness.

Advisor

Date Range for Data Collection (Start Date)

Date Range for Data Collection (End Date)

Digital Object Identifier

Series name and number

Publication date

2015-12-01

Journal title

Journal of Experimental Psychology: General

Volume number

Issue number

Publisher

Publisher DOI

Journal Issues

Comments

Recommended citation

Collection