Functional MRI-Based Lie Detection: Scientific and Societal Challenges

Loading...
Thumbnail Image

Embargo Date

Related Collections

Degree type

Discipline

Subject

fMRI
functional magnetic resonance imaging
functional MRI
lie detection
Bioethics and Medical Ethics
Criminology
Criminology and Criminal Justice
Neuroscience and Neurobiology
Neurosciences

Funder

Grant number

License

Copyright date

Distributor

Related resources

Author

Hutchinson, J. Benjamin
Phelps, Elizabeth A
Wagner, Anthony D

Contributor

Abstract

Functional MRI (fMRI)-based lie detection has been marketed as a tool for enhancing personnel selection, strengthening national security and protecting personal reputations, and at least three US courts have been asked to admit the results of lie detection scans as evidence during trials. How well does fMRI-based lie detection perform, and how should the courts, and society more generally, respond? Here, we address various questions — some of which are based on a meta-analysis of published studies — concerning the scientific state of the art in fMRI-based lie detection and its legal status, and discuss broader ethical and societal implications. We close with three general policy recommendations.

Advisor

Date Range for Data Collection (Start Date)

Date Range for Data Collection (End Date)

Digital Object Identifier

Series name and number

Publication date

2014-01-01

Journal title

Nature Reviews Neuroscience

Volume number

Issue number

Publisher

Publisher DOI

Journal Issues

Comments

Correction for the published paper, 19 Feb. 2014: An incorrect paper was cited as reference 2 of this article. The correct paper is Ganis, G., Rosenfeld, J. P., Meixner, J., Kievit, R. A. & Schendan, H. E. Lying in the scanner: covert countermeasures disrupt deception detection by functional magnetic resonance imaging. Neuroimage 55, 312–319 (2011). This has been corrected in the online version. doi:10.1038/nrn3702

Recommended citation

Collection