Assessing IPv6 Through Web Access - A Measurement Study and Its Findings

Loading...
Thumbnail Image

Related Collections

Degree type

Discipline

Subject

IPv6
adoption
performance
measurements
OS and Networks
Systems and Communications

Funder

Grant number

License

Copyright date

Distributor

Related resources

Contributor

Abstract

Transitioning an infrastructure the size of the Internet is no small feat. We are in the midst of such a transition, \ie from IPv4 to IPv6. IPv6 was standardized 15~years ago, but until recently there were few incentives to adopt it. The allocation of the last large block of IPv4 addresses changed that, and migrating to an IPv6 Internet has become more urgent. This migration is, however, still rife with uncertainties and challenges. The goal of this paper is to provide insight into this transition, and possibly make it smoother. The focus is on the ``network,'' and the paper reports on extensive measurements that compare and contrast IPv6 and IPv4. Two important hypotheses, denoted as H1 and H2, were identified and validated. H1 argues that the IPv6 and IPv4 data planes now perform by and large comparably. In contrast, H2 points to routing differences as the primary culprit behind occurrences of poorer IPv6 performance. In other words, promoting IPv6 and IPv4 peering parity is probably the single most effective step towards equal IPv6 and IPv4 performance

Advisor

Date of presentation

2011-12-01

Conference name

Departmental Papers (ESE)

Conference dates

2023-05-17T06:39:08.000

Conference location

Date Range for Data Collection (Start Date)

Date Range for Data Collection (End Date)

Digital Object Identifier

Series name and number

Volume number

Issue number

Publisher

Publisher DOI

relationships.isJournalIssueOf

Comments

Suggested Citation: Nikkhah, M., Guérin, R.A., Lee, Y. and Woundy, R. (2011). Assessing IPv6 Through Web Access - A Measurement Study and Its Findings. In Proc. ACM CoNEXT 2011, December 2011, Tokyo, Japan. © ACM, 2011. This is the author's version of the work. It is posted here by permission of ACM for your personal use. Not for redistribution. The definitive version will be published in Proceedings of ACM CoNEXT 2011. Email permissions@acm.org

Recommended citation

Collection