Return postage in mail surveys: a meta analysis

Loading...
Thumbnail Image

Related Collections

Degree type

Discipline

Subject

Funder

Grant number

License

Copyright date

Distributor

Related resources

Author

Lusk, Edward J

Contributor

Abstract

This paper describes a five-step procedure for meta-analysis. Especially important was the contacting of authors of prior papers. This was done primarily to improve the accuracy of the coding; it also helped to identify unpublished research and to supply missing information. Application of the five-step procedure to the issue of return postage in mail surveys yielded significantly more papers and produced more definitive conclusions than those derived from traditional reviews. This meta-analysis indicated that business reply postage is seldom cost effective because first class postage yields an additional 9% return. Business reply rates were lower than for other first class postage in each of the 20 comparisons.

Advisor

Date Range for Data Collection (Start Date)

Date Range for Data Collection (End Date)

Digital Object Identifier

Series name and number

Publication date

1987-06-01

Journal title

Volume number

Issue number

Publisher

Publisher DOI

Journal Issues

Comments

Postprint version. This is a pre-copy-editing author-produced PDF of an article published in Public Opinion Quarterly, Volume 51, Issue 2, Summer 1987, pages 233-248, following peer review. Publisher URL: http://poq.oxfordjournals.org/

Recommended citation

Collection