Responsibility, Repair and Redistribution in the Wake of the Financial Crisis

Loading...
Thumbnail Image

Degree type

Discipline

Subject

Banking and Finance Law
Business Law, Public Responsibility, and Ethics
Corporate Finance
Economic Policy
Finance
Finance and Financial Management
Law
Legal Studies
Organizational Behavior and Theory
Real Estate

Funder

Grant number

License

Copyright date

Distributor

Related resources

Contributor

Abstract

Who bears responsibility for the financial crisis? The list of possible culprits is unmanageably long and at times internally inconsistent, as it includes subprime mortgages and over-zealous mortgage originators; risk-happy investment bankers and the ineffectual ratings agents who rubber-stamped the bankers' exotic products; and neoconservatives hell-bent on deregulation along with liberal politicians cowering before entities they allowed to become too big to fail.1 Nonetheless the question of responsibility seems to demand an answer not only for purposes of arriving at lessons that might avert a future crisis but also for answering a second question that seems a natural corollary of the first—viz., who bears responsibility for funding the bailouts necessitated by the financial crisis? More specifically, who in the United States bears responsiblity for funding the bailouts undertaken by the U.S. government?

Advisor

Date Range for Data Collection (Start Date)

Date Range for Data Collection (End Date)

Digital Object Identifier

Series name and number

Publication date

2013-01-01

Journal title

Georgetown Journal of Law & Public Policy

Volume number

Issue number

Publisher

Publisher DOI

relationships.isJournalIssueOf

Comments

Recommended citation

Collection