Evaluation and Summary of PA Site Deaccession by PHMC

Loading...
Thumbnail Image

Embargo Date

Degree type

Graduate group

Discipline

Subject

Deaccession
Blue Ribbon Report
Pennsylvania Historical and Museum Commission
Placed Property
Partnered Property
Historic Preservation and Conservation

Funder

Grant number

License

Copyright date

Distributor

Related resources

Contributor

Abstract

This thesis evaluated the process by which the Pennsylvania Historical and Museum Commission (PHMC) deaccessed its publicly owned historical sites through the Blue-Ribbon Report (1981) and the Blue Ribbon Committee (1997) to determine sites response and determine which typology of deaccession was the Most, Less, and Least successful. As a direct result of drastic budgets cuts by the Commonwealth PHMC’s sites that it directly administrated and operated dropped from 57 in 1981 to 14 in 2019. The first report in 1981 split the 57 sites into three groups of importance (Most, Less and Least ) based on integrity, significance, and historical value. The second report in 1997 ranked the remaining 27 non-deaccessed sites on the same three criteria with the addition of audience potential and community support. Washington Crossing Historic Park, Morton Homestead, Daniel Boone Homestead, and the P.A Military Museum were selected for evaluation that reflected the four methods of deaccession by PHMC: Transferred, Leased, Partnered, and retained. Through the analysis and interviews held with the four sites gauged how the site responded at the time the reports were released, awareness as of 2020 of the rankings, how deaccession transition occurred, supporting Friends group response, identification of other deaccession factors, and current status of the site. Once addressed, it was possible to ranking the four deaccession typology resulting in: Most-Transfer, Less-Partnered and/or Retained, Least- Leased. This information provides a better understanding of deaccession processes based on budget cuts that could better enhance community, public and administrative understanding.

Advisor

Date of degree

2020-09-01

Date Range for Data Collection (Start Date)

Date Range for Data Collection (End Date)

Digital Object Identifier

Series name and number

Volume number

Issue number

Publisher

Publisher DOI

Journal Issues

Comments

Recommended citation