SURVIVORS OF A MILITARY SUICIDE DEATH: EXPLORING DISTRESS AND POSTVENTION PEER SUPPORT

Loading...
Thumbnail Image

Degree type

Doctor of Social Work (DSW)

Graduate group

Discipline

Subject

Military Suicide Loss
Suicide Postvention
Peer Support
Complicated Grief
PTSD
Suicidality
Education
Medicine and Health Sciences
Other Social and Behavioral Sciences
Psychology
Public Affairs, Public Policy and Public Administration
Social and Behavioral Sciences
Social Policy
Social Welfare
Social Work
Sociology

Funder

Grant number

License

Copyright date

Distributor

Related resources

Contributor

Abstract

SURVIVORS OF A MILITARY SUICIDE DEATH: EXPLORING DISTRESS AND POSTVENTION PEER SUPPORT In the past decade, as the rate of suicides among United States (U.S.) Armed Services members have steadily risen, so too has the number of survivors impacted by military suicide death. When a loved one, friend, family member, or co-worker dies as a result of a suicide, the ensuing shock and trauma -- along with unique issues accompanying suicide bereavement -- may compromise the mental and physical health of survivors. This leaves them vulnerable to a more distressing and complicated grief process. Those bereaved by suicide are at higher risk for completing suicide themselves. Peer support, an acknowledged basis of recovery from mental illness and addictions, has been clinically observed to be widely utilized by suicide loss survivors. Researchers have paid little attention to efficacious interventions for survivors of suicide loss in the general population of the U.S., even less is known about the efficacy of peer support among survivors of a U.S. military suicide death. In order to assess this gap in clinical knowledge, fifty-two (N=52) survivors of military suicide loss were administered two self-report instruments to evaluate the association between exposure to peer support and perceived distress. This exploratory study with an at-risk bereaved population has yielded a number of new insights and conclusions. Recommendations for clinical practice and future research are discussed.

Date of degree

2011-05-11

Date Range for Data Collection (Start Date)

Date Range for Data Collection (End Date)

Digital Object Identifier

Series name and number

Volume number

Issue number

Publisher

Publisher DOI

Journal Issues

Comments

Recommended citation