How Much Do We Count? Interpretation and Error-Making in the Decennial Census

Loading...
Thumbnail Image

Embargo Date

Related Collections

Degree type

Discipline

Subject

Funder

Grant number

License

Copyright date

Distributor

Related resources

Author

Furstenberg, Frank F
Belzer, Alisa Alom

Contributor

Abstract

Following a critique of the 1990 decennial census procedures, we conducted a field study among low-income, inner-city residents in 1991 to examine how they conceptualized and managed the civic task of census response. Interpretations about the purpose and meaning of the census, about commitment to the task, and about connection to government, singly and together with literacy skills (e.g., reading and general literacy competence), were associated with errors that are not detectable by evaluative methodologies used regularly by the Census Bureau. The validity and reliability of census data, and possibly other self-administered survey research, will be increased by greater use of knowledge about both interpretation and literacy skills in formulating data collection procedures.

Advisor

Date Range for Data Collection (Start Date)

Date Range for Data Collection (End Date)

Digital Object Identifier

Series name and number

Publication date

1999-02-01

Journal title

Volume number

Issue number

Publisher

Publisher DOI

Journal Issues

Comments

Reprinted from Demography, Volume 36, Issue 1, February 1999, pages 121-134. Publisher URL: http://hdl.library.upenn.edu/1017/1901 Permission granted by Population Association of America.

Recommended citation

Collection