The Federal Role in Defining Adequate Yearly Progress: The Flexibility/Accountability Trade-Off

Loading...
Thumbnail Image

Related Collections

Degree type

Discipline

Subject

Curriculum and Instruction
Educational Assessment, Evaluation, and Research
Educational Methods
Elementary and Middle and Secondary Education Administration

Funder

Grant number

License

Copyright date

Distributor

Related resources

Contributor

Abstract

Bills passed by the U. S. House of Representatives and the U.S. Senate in spring 2001 to reauthorize the Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA) not only reinforce but strengthen the education accountability provisions contained in the Improving America’s Schools Act (IASA) of 1994. Title I of the IASA requires states to establish challenging content and performance standards, implement assessments that measure student performance against these standards, and hold schools and school systems accountable for the achievement of all students. Specifically, states and local school districts must determine whether schools and school districts are making adequate yearly progress (AYP) in bringing students up to state standards, identify for school improvement any school that does not made adequate yearly progress for two consecutive school years, target resources to these schools, and, if necessary, take corrective action.

Advisor

Date Range for Data Collection (Start Date)

Date Range for Data Collection (End Date)

Digital Object Identifier

Series name and number

Publication date

2001-09-01

Volume number

Issue number

Publisher

Publisher DOI

relationships.isJournalIssueOf

Recommended citation

Collection