Private Political Authority and Public Responsibility: Transnational Politics, Transnational Firms, and Human Rights

Loading...
Thumbnail Image

Related Collections

Degree type

Discipline

Subject

Business Administration, Management, and Operations
Business Law, Public Responsibility, and Ethics
International Business

Funder

Grant number

License

Copyright date

Distributor

Related resources

Contributor

Abstract

Transnational corporations have become actors with significant political power and authority which should entail responsibility and liability, specifically direct liability for complicity in human rights violations. Holding TNCs liable for human rights violations is complicated by the discontinuity between the fragmented legal/political structure of the TNC and its integrated strategic reality and the international state system which privileges sovereignty and non-intervention over the protection of individual rights. However, the post-Westphalian transition—the emergence of multiple authorities, increasing ambiguity of borders and jurisdiction and blurring of the line between the public and private spheres—should facilitate imposing direct responsibility on transnational firms. Mechanisms for imposing direct responsibility on TNCs are considered including voluntary agreements and international law. However, I conclude that a hybrid public-private regime which relies on non-hierarchical compliance mechanisms is likely to be both more effective and consistent with the structure of the emerging transnational order.

Advisor

Date Range for Data Collection (Start Date)

Date Range for Data Collection (End Date)

Digital Object Identifier

Series name and number

Publication date

2009-07-01

Journal title

Business Ethics Quarterly

Volume number

Issue number

Publisher

Publisher DOI

Journal Issues

Comments

Recommended citation

Collection