Brain Overclaim Syndrome and Criminal Responsibility: A Diagnostic Note

Loading...
Thumbnail Image

Embargo Date

Related Collections

Degree type

Discipline

Subject

brain overclaim syndrome
neuroscience
criminal responsibility
Roper v. Simmons
cognitive jurotherapy

Funder

Grant number

License

Copyright date

Distributor

Related resources

Contributor

Abstract

This brief diagnostic note identifies a cognitive pathology, "Brain Overclaim Syndrome [BOS]," that often afflicts those inflamed by the fascinating new discoveries in the neurosciences. It begins by suggesting how one should think about the relation of neuroscience (or any other material explanation of human behavior) to criminal responsibility, distinguishing between internal and external critiques based on neuroscience. It then describes the signs and symptoms of BOS, the essential feature of which is to make claims about the implications of neuroscience for criminal responsibility that cannot be conceptually or empirically sustained. It then applies the diagnostic lens of BOS to the claims in Roper v. Simmons. Finally, the article recommends Cognitive Jurotherapy [CJ] as the therapy of choice for BOS.

Advisor

Date Range for Data Collection (Start Date)

Date Range for Data Collection (End Date)

Digital Object Identifier

Series name and number

Publication date

2006-01-01

Journal title

Volume number

Issue number

Publisher

Publisher DOI

Journal Issues

Comments

Postprint version. Published in Ohio State Journal of Criminal Law, Volume 3, 2006, pages 397-412.

Recommended citation

Collection